Big City Lib a Big City Pornographer?

The rather distasteful Big City Liberal once again shows us just how big a tent the Liberal Party of Canada has. Aside from anti-semitic posts that drove Warren Kinsella to out BCL's identity, we can now add child pornogrpaher (warning - under age male, naked)

The Case:

Daniel Radcliffe - Born July 23, 1989

From Wikipedia:

Canada

Under the Criminal Code provisions in Canada, material that shows someone who is or is "depicted as being" under 18, and is engaged or "depicted as engaged" in explicit sexual activity, is classified as "child pornography". Photographs of the genitals or anal region of someone under 18, "for a sexual purpose", are illegal, as are written texts that advocate sex with a child.

The penalty for making or distributing child pornography is up to 10 years in prison. Possession or "accessing" carries a potential sentence of up to 5 years.

And BCL comments:

Warner Brothers is worried about his movie career, but with an ass like that he can always do porn.

And so we can add Child Pornographer to the list of distasteful things BCL does. You can't claim artistic merit when you are commenting on Radcliffe's ass in a sexual manner. Where are those conservative judges when you need them?